The control of bovine tuberculosis is enormously controversial, mainly because wild badgers can transmit the disease to cattle. Farming groups have tended to prefer culling badgers over vaccinating them. Professor Rosie Woodroffe explains how new ZSL research should help to allay farmers’ fears about vaccination.
'Badgergeddon!' That’s how one of Britain’s national newspapers described the ongoing cull of badgers, intended to curb the spread of bovine tuberculosis (TB) to cattle.
The culls are highly controversial. Farmers clamour for decisive action to control a disease which causes them economic hardship and mental stress.
Leading vets warn that shot badgers suffer unacceptably before they die.
Wars of words turn into direct action. Marksmen seek to kill as many badgers as possible, while protestors try to stop them, crushing cage traps with mallets and scaring badgers away with bright lights.
Badger vaccination should be a more promising approach.
Government trials suggest that badger vaccination could curb TB transmission: badgers which have been vaccinated are less likely to subsequently test positive for TB, as are unvaccinated cubs in the same group.
Better still, wildlife enthusiasts are willing to help vaccinate badgers on a voluntary basis, further reducing the costs, and building cooperation instead of conflict in rural communities. And yet, farming leaders remain intensely suspicious of badger vaccination as a TB control tool.
Media reports fuel this suspicion with unsubstantiated claims that vaccination is a “catastrophic failure” which “may add to the spread of TB”. These claims originate with a single vet who speculated that vaccination might cause badgers to range more widely, increasing the spread of infection to cattle. This suggestion was completely hypothetical: in fact nobody has mapped badger movements in the area where such effects were claimed.
Why have such concerns arisen?
Probably because badger culling DOES change the behaviour of surviving badgers, in just the way claimed for vaccination.
Where badgers are undisturbed, social groups defend territories from which they aggressively exclude other badgers – a behaviour which reduces disease spread from group to group. Culling changes all that.
Is it possible for badger vaccination to have the same effect?
Vaccination does not remove badgers permanently, but it does confine them to a trap for a night, interfering briefly with their normal territorial behaviour.
Might this brief disturbance alter their behaviour, or that of their neighbours, helping to spread TB?
Our new research suggests that it does not.
As part of a long-term study, we fitted GPS-tracking collars to 54 badgers within four TB-affected areas of Cornwall. We found that these animals were no more likely to trespass in neighbours’ territories on nights when some of those neighbours were confined to traps, than on nights without trapping.
Might the vaccine itself alter badger behaviour?
Researchers have suggested that TB-affected badgers may range more widely than those which are not infected.
As the vaccine is essentially a mild form of TB bacteria, could it change badger behaviour in a similar way?
Again, our new research suggests not.
Of our 54 GPS-collared badgers, 15 (at two of the sites) were vaccinated at least once in the course of the study. These vaccinated badgers had ranging behaviour indistinguishable from that of unvaccinated badgers. If there was a difference, it was too small for us to detect, but was significantly smaller than the change prompted by culling, which increased badger range sizes by 180% for large-scale culls, and 74% for small-scale culls.
Indeed, the Achilles heel of culling, badger social behaviour, actually makes vaccination more promising, because badger territoriality and vaccination work together to reduce the probability that an infected badger will interact with badgers which can become infected.
Controlling TB is a huge and exhausting challenge, and it is perhaps unsurprising that farmers would be wary of new approaches. Hopefully our findings should help to allay some of their concerns.
What is now needed is a proper trial to establish whether badger vaccination can reduce TB prevalence in both badgers and cattle.
Select a blog
Our people are our greatest asset and we realise our vision for a world where wildlife thrives through their ideas, skills and passion. An inspired, informed and empowered community of people work, study and volunteer together at ZSL.
At ZSL, a key area of our work is the employment of Nature-based Solutions – an approach which both adapt to and mitigates the impacts of climate change. These Solutions, which include habitat protection and restoration, are low-cost yet high-impact, and provide multiple benefits to people and wildlife. We ensure that biodiversity recovery is at the heart of nature-based solutions.
A blog for lovers of ZSL London Zoo, bringing you extraordinary animal facts and exclusive access to the world's oldest scientific zoo.
Do you love wildlife? Discover more about our amazing animals at the UK's biggest zoo!
We're working around the world to conserve animals and their habitats, find out more about our latest achievements.
From the field to the lab, catch up with the scientists on the cutting edge of conservation biology at ZSL’s Institute of Zoology.
A day in Discovery and Learning at ZSL is never dull! The team tell us all about the exciting sessions for school children, as well as work further afield.
Every month, one of the pieces held in ZSL’s Library and at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo will feature here as Artefact of the Month.
Read testimonials from our Members and extracts from ZSL's award winning members' magazine, Wild About.
ZSL works across Asia, from the famous national parks of Nepal to marine protected areas in the Philippines. Read the latest updates on our conservation.
An Open Access journal for research at the interface of remote sensing, ecology and conservation.