Part of the beauty of collaborative research projects is the
sharing of information and expertise. Every day at base camp, researchers and students from around the world exchange ideas. We assist each other day in and day out, sharing our thoughts and experiences in the lab, in the field and over the dinner table: the best way to assess species abundance over mee goreng. And even after the longest, hottest days trekking through the jungle helping me to
find elephant poo, our invaluable research assistants who are local Orang Sungai traditional fishers, catch fish and giant river prawns for communal meals. So while we can share everything with our colleagues and friends with open minds and hearts, why all around us is there evidence of an inability to share our planet with wildlife?
The elephants we are tracking are squeezed into a small,
isolated patch of secondary forest. All day and night trucks laden with tonnes of oil palm kernels roar down the road through the reserve, honking loudly to scatter the elephants. Crowded along the riverbank feeding, they stand in the hot sun unable to enter the water as tourist boats circle like vultures and a ferry belches black smoke into the air. Litter is strewn about and some of the elephants attracted by the strange aromas swallow plastic. The group starts to cross the river to reach another tiny forest fragment on the opposite bank. But mothers cannot cross. Their young are too small to brave the water. Women and children are usually the first to be evacuated in an emergency but in this conservation emergency, it appears that elephant mothers and calves are not spared.
Outsiders can preach against palm oil until they are black and blue. If it were possible, consumers could boycott products (which are innumerable and in some cases, unlabelled). But these actions are unlikely to have any real impact on the palm oil industry, entrenched here in the economy and society, with diversified interests, eager buyers the world over and every reason to continue refusing to share. Would you share if by sharing you might have fewer homes, jobs, schools, playing fields and mosques for yourself, your family and your community? Moreover, would you share if the reward for not sharing was billions of dollars in your bank account?
The value of arguments in favour of sharing space with elephants is in the eye of the beholder. For example moral arguments or even economic rationales based on the tourism revenue or ecosystem services provided by elephants might be deemed priceless by conservation scientists but worthless by planters who are reaping the benefits of habitat conversion or locals who are scared because an elephant has wandered past their homes (an elephant who incidentally has nowhere else left to go).
Arguably, as the logging and palm oil industries began here relatively recently in the 1980s, an equilibrium between man and elephant in Malaysia existed up until very recently. For example, in Machang, peninsula Malaysia, villagers had not seen crop raiding elephants for the past fifty years but with accelerated logging over the past few years incidents of human elephant conflict have been reported this year.
It might take forever to understand all the complex social, economic, cultural and scientific complexities of the conservation dilemma posed by palm oil but the elephants don’t have that much time. At the end of the day, what they need is for us to just to share, to give and take rather than just taking and taking and taking. Giving some habitat and resources back to the elephants and other wildlife would not mean the end of multibillion dollar industries such as timber or palm oil. The future of profits and employment would be just as secure. The only difference would be that we would share this secure future with unique wildlife found nowhere else on earth.
The problem is not that there isn’t enough to go around. It’s that we’re not sharing what is available. What will it take to persuade us to share?
- Stephanie Hing
Select a blog
Follow the latest news on ZSL’s Arts & Culture projects at ZSL London and Whipsnade Zoos, and ZSL’s conservation work through the lense of the Arts.
Catch up on our latest Conservation Blogs
Join the ZSL Discovery and Learning team as they venture out of the zoo and in to the wild.
ZSL Whipsnade Zoo's elephant keepers give an insight into the daily goings on in the elephant barn.
ZSL carried out the first range-wide conservation status review of the okapi. Read updates from the field.
Read about conservation of tigers in Asia.
One man is boldly going where no other ZSL videographer has gone before - the land of Mountain Chicken Frogs.
A blog for lovers of ZSL London Zoo. Bringing you amazing animal facts and exclusive access to the world's scientific oldest zoo.
Every month one of the pieces held in ZSL’s Library and at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo will feature here as Artefact of the month.
From the field, to the lab, catch up with the scientists on the cutting edge of conservation biology at ZSL’s Institute of Zoology.
The Wildlife Wood Project has been working in Cameroon since 2007 to encourage better wildlife management in logging concessions.
Updates from penguin conservation expeditions to Antarctica
Amur leopard conservation blog
Meet ZSL Whipsnade Zoo's latest (and leggiest) arrival, a baby giraffe!
Follow the ZSL Biodiversity and Palm Oil team, based in Bogor, Indonesia.
The Chagos marine reserve, designated in 2010 and currently the world’s largest no take marine reserve, is a sought-after spot for marine research.
Follow ZSL’s amphibian experts in their quest to find out why 41% of the world’s amphibians are threatened and what can be done to stop more species becoming extinct.
Follow ZSL conservationists studying desert baboons in Namibia.